Got schooled 2 weeks+ ago that SCOTUS ruled in the 50's that the Naturalization Oath was ceremonial only and not enforceable.
*But I still point it out. .
Layout your references because there is still a standing statute for naturalized citizens to undergo an oath of allegiance ceremony.
Lay out your linked references and I will bet you that your info was taken out of context.
For example, a ceremonial oath of allegiance, how can that not be ‘enforceable’? Such ceremonies are still required. And when they are administered, those oath ceremonies clearly put the naturalized citizen at risk of treasonous crime if they should ever commit acts of treason.
Otherwise, we could have naturalized US citizens who act to overthrow the United States immune to charges of treason; ridiculous.
How would an oath of allegiance taken by a naturalized citizen be unenforceable yet the same oath taken by an FBI agent be enforceable?
Layout your references and don’t waste time. If you don’t know, say you don’t know.