Replies

One might think Afghanistan could be one place to patriate/repatriate some of the 1.2 million Muslims of London and the 1.5 million Muslims in England outside London.

Figure 25k BP Sterling per head annually for 5 years. Total cost 325B BP equivalent to $455 Billion, roughly half a trillion USD.

This will never happen of course, until Brits change. In the meantime, the Muslims in London will howl obscenities at even a thought of mass population movement.

HISTORY LESSON
Early 20th Century thinking worked to a degree in the great 1923 population exchange between Greece and Turkey. The above movement of Muslims from England would be a one-way population movement with money offered. But it won’t happen because of what followed in the aftermath of the 1923 great population exchange.

When one studies the history leading to the great population exchange of 1923, the conditions are eerily similar to what is reported today; rape of non-Muslim women as a daily expected occurrence, women afraid to venture out alone, non-Muslim males attempting to reason and appease Muslim leaders as to policy proposals to regain order and stability, reneged agreements, bad faith, ever-growing Muslim presence, increasing violence.

The slippery slope with this history is that it gave Nazis ideas, ideas to purify their race from what they considered undesirable elements, namely Jews and Gypsies, and in later years, Poles. No one of westernized values can stomach the thought of that. But Nazis of the time were aligned with Islam against Jews because Islamic lands of the Middle East contained the oil that drove the German economy. Germans did not have a Muslim problem at the time, they had a communist problem much of which was blamed on Jews in Russia bringing poisonous thinking to radical Jews in Germany. This was the backdrop formed in the aftermath of the great population exchange of 1923. The exchange was successful enough to drive later social policies to mimic the principles in other ways.

This is what Muslims create by failing to assimilate. They create tension, conflict, loss of the host’s culture and traditions by a supplanting of Islam, a Muslim takeover drives a reaction that borders on ethnic cleansing, xenophobia, nativism. Like it or not, these events follow naturally from the Muslim pattern of parasitic feeding on the host until the host is dead.

Whereas Jews, by and large, assimilate to the host and become social assets (except where communist ideology permeates), the bulk of Muslim culture forms a neolithic block that eats the host until it is neutralized or dead.

The memories of the horrors of Nazi Germany will never allow for Muslims to be driven from London and resettled outside England. The result is as observed, the fall of London to an alien culture and the politically correct persecution of any Brits that dare to stand up and speak about the problem.

There are no enduring solutions or resolutions other than war. War is inevitable unless, by some improbable turn of events, Brits form a solid block towards the goal of resettling their incorrigible Muslim horde outside Britain. Good luck with that.