Because I could not imagine the fat woman having sex. Ever. Gross.
On a 2008 Presidential Candidate Questionnaire, candidate Hillary was asked:
Will you work to operationalize the “Responsibility to Protect,” in response to global humanitarian crises?
HILLARY'S ANSWER WAS EXTRAORDINARILY SPECIFIC:
Yes. In adopting the principle of the responsibility to protect, the United Nations accepted the principle that mass atrocities that take place in one state are the concern of all states. It is essential that the new UN Secy General of begin to bridge the gap between these words and the institution’s deeds through a series of reforms intended to operationalize this concept. I am also committed to seeing that the US and other economic and militarily capable states and organization take steps to bolster UN action. As President I will:
<><>(A) adopt a policy that recognizes the prevention of mass atrocities as an important national security interest of the US, not just a humanitarian goal.
<><>(B) develop a govt-wide strategy to support this policy, including a strategy for working with other leading democracies, the UN, and regional organizations.
<><>(C) authorize my Secy of State to institutionalize atrocity prevention into the work of the State Dept, and,
<><> (D) direct my Secy of State to strongly support the mission and activities of the Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization, which plays an increasingly critical role.
===========================================
AFTERMATH--As a candidate, two-faced Hillary said one thing.......
but as Obama's hand-picked Secy of State, Hillary's actions on Libya were decidedly different
and were driven by a longine Clinton crony being paid by business interests in Libya-----Sid Blumenthal.
cont
Maybe that’s why? She needs someone who can’t say no when ordered to perform. Just saying.