Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rexthecat

“I sure could support a concerted effort to get mentally disturbed individuals into the background check database. I can’t believe so many never make it in, allowing them to buy guns.”

The term “mentally disturbed” is as well defined as the term “assault weapon”. It’s kind of like pornography: I know it when I see it.

We’ll need some criteria for “mentally disturbed” and the opinions of anti-gun, pro control mental health “experts” won’t cut it.


14 posted on 02/23/2018 7:12:44 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: KrisKrinkle; RitchieAprile
The term “mentally disturbed” is as well defined as the term “assault weapon”. It’s kind of like pornography: I know it when I see it.

There is a legal definition for mental illness just as there is for felony. If you've been adjudicated as mentally defective by a court and committed to a mental institution for your own protection and that of others, you're considered unfit to bear arms.

We already have laws in place to prevent such people from buying or possessing firearms. This is about enforcing laws that are already on the books and that almost everyone agrees with, not about creating new laws and restrictions.

23 posted on 02/23/2018 7:29:30 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson