You dont even make sense
If all kids are blood tested at birth - then a second blood test would be used to confirm the diagnosis of autism
Thats what the article is about!
So compare them
Cruel to do a blood test to confirm a diagnosis? Please stop already
If a doc thought your toddler was autistic you’d have access to a blood test to confirm rather than waiting years to start interventions
I am one of a legion of parents whose kids were affected with symptoms and deteriorating behaviors within hours or days of vax
A huge number of “ coincidences”
Now that you scientists can clear away suspicions with simple blood tests - I don’t get it with the resistance
Oh wait
Yes I do
I can tell--reading comprehension is not your strong point. What I have said, repeatedly, is that if a blood test done at birth (at the time that a battery of blood tests are performed) can show whether or not a child is autistic, then why on earth would you subject the child repeatedly to more blood tests for autism? That is utterly cruel, and will not "prove" what you want to prove.
If the kid has a positive test for autism at birth, then other testing (not blood tests) would need to be done to confirm the diagnosis. If the kid tests negative, then how many times do you want to subject that kid to blood tests? Why not just drain all of his blood?
So compare them
Cruel to do a blood test to confirm a diagnosis? Please stop already
If a doc thought your toddler was autistic you’d have access to a blood test to confirm rather than waiting years to start interventions
Once again, your lack of reading comprehension shows clearly. If your infant tests positive for biomarkers of autism at birth, you'll want to start interventions immediately. Who is saying that you would wait and wait for years after the kid has already tested positive? I sure as heck didn't say that.
I am one of a legion of parents whose kids were affected with symptoms and deteriorating behaviors within hours or days of vax
A huge number of “ coincidences”
Now that you scientists can clear away suspicions with simple blood tests - I don’t get it with the resistance
Oh wait
Yes I do
There is no way to be delicate here, so I probably shouldn't even try. You were reading up for years about this imaginary link between autism and vaccines. The fact that millions of dollars were wasted trying to verify that non-existent link means nothing to you. The fact that the "doctor" who published the imaginary link between vaccines and autism committed fraud in search of profit means nothing to you. The fact that signs of autism show up within a certain age range regardless of vaccination status means nothing to you. You want to believe that vaccines somehow cause autism because a child whose autistic behavior becomes evident has always received at least one vaccine within the last few months (if his parents are following the vaccine schedule), and you have no understanding of the concept that correlation does not equal causation. You just want to blame some exterior factor for the fact that YOU passed aberrant genes to your child that caused autism. Well, vaccines were not the source of the aberrant genes that caused your child's brain not to develop properly. YOU were the source of those genes.
Your understanding of brain development and your understanding of how vaccines work are both nearly nonexistent. Try to learn a little about both before you try to scare parents into leaving their children susceptible to potentially lethal diseases because your kid has a genetic disorder.