Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Crucial

All this article does is remind me that there is no more powerful force in the world than race hatred.

And it’s mostly directed against whites, because when you take away our achievements, there’s not much civilization left.


66 posted on 02/16/2018 12:18:12 AM PST by Nothingburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nothingburger
"... no more powerful force in the world than race hatred .."

I hate to say anything that makes me sound like a "conspiracy nut," but what the hey! This is FR after all! But anyhow ...

I feel that the current vitriolic outpouring of racial hatred from Blacks and, to a lesser degree from Hispanics, is deliberately instigated and egged on by white leftists, and that it's no coincidence it began in Obama's second term.

Democrats were ecstatic to see a leftist win the White House in 2008, just as in 1992. But the problem has always been in getting a leftist Prez re-elected 4 yrs later, because they will then have a record they must run on and defend, a record that invariably stinks to high heaven.

Both candidates won their first terms by winning the lion's share of the UAF's (unaffiliated voters) - the "center" of the electorate who have traditionally decided who wins the White House.

For Clinton, the snake oil peddled by the MSM that won him his first term was that he was a "New Democrat," a conservative Southern small-state governor who would rule from the center instead of the Left. For Obama, their snake oil was that all that pent-up White Guilt suffered by the Left and most of the center, could with a single election be banished forever. The "historic" election of a black man would finally, once and for all, drive a nail into the coffin of the divisive racical issue. White America could atone for the sins of their ancestors by elevating BHO to the Presidency. This was America's big chance to be a post-racial society.

The snake oil, different brands for different elections, worked as planned.

But with both WJC and BHO, the reality of how they governed in their first terms blew their covers, leaving them vulnerable for re-election, as the great middle-of-the-road voters turned against them.

November 1994 was Clinton's wakeup call, as The Center overwhelmingly revolted. To compensate, he had to move significantly towards the center for the next 2 years. That, plus a political war chest swamping that of Bob Dole's (much of it illegally obtained from foreign fatcats & rulers), plus Perot's repeat role of Spoiler, let him eke out a plurality in enough states, as the UAF's forgave him and once again gave him more votes than they did Dole.

But Obama's re-election was quite different. He never shifted towards the center during his first term. And the UAF's turned against him, and voted for Romney over him.

By all the time-honored political equations of US Presidential election history, Obama should have lost. But instead, something exceedingly rare happened: an incumbent who lost the UAF vote nevertheless eked out a victory.

Unheard of. So how did this happen? The major reason: Because blacks, who always overwhelmingly vote reflexively for Democrats, but who rarely turn out in large numbers, defied their traditional voting patterns for both elections. And in 2012, that edge was sufficient for the first time in recent memory to overcome a loss of the UAF voters.

I think the movers & shakers of the Dems, including their Sugar Daddies like Soros and Steyer and their ilk, realized that Obama's re-election was a fluke, made possible only by his race providing extremely high motivation to black voters. Looking to the post-Obama era, they saw no other viable black candidates to replace him on the ballot, and knew the black voter turnout would surely subside to its traditional anemic levels.

So once his re-election was over, they knew that to continue putting leftists into the WH, they had to continue ginning up the black vote, to find a way to keep that turnout high.

So here comes my Conspiracy Theory: I think they figured that pushing all the racial hatred buttons they had, as often & as hard as they could, would light a fire under black voters to keep their voter enthusiasm high.

That's why midway into Obama's 2nd term we saw big Leftist money - particularly from Soros groups - stoking the hatred in Ferguson MO, selling the "Hands Up" lie to blacks. And funding Black Lives Matter, to stoke hatred between blacks and cops, particularly white cops. ... To name just a few.

I believe this was all to increase black turnout in 2016.

Eventually, if they succeed in remaking America by importing millions of new voters in sufficient numbers to enough swing states (flipping Texas and Florida alone should suffice to create a permanent one-party nation), they'll have no need for Blacks any more, except to count on them to perpetually elect radical Left black congresswomen and men from urban areas. Once they're superfluous to White Leftist goals, expect the hundred-year-old anti-black Eugenics program to shift into high gear with a new abortion clinic in every urban neighborhood in America.

87 posted on 02/16/2018 3:15:19 AM PST by CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC ("Blessed are the young, for they shall inherit the national debt" - Pr. Herbert Hoover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson