Not my words FRiend. I find it problematic on several levels. This before the rumors of this being a counter intel action to stop further attention on the MegaAnon commentary where evidence of being an independent contractor working in senior government circles was proven.
That it may be connected to a David Brock group, Share Blue is even more cause for skepticism.
The so-called hit predicting terrorism in NYC is worse than wrong.
If you knew there was a terrorist action coming, why would you do nothing and allow three bystanders to be hurt, even if the bomb was a dud?
That’s not problematic; that’s criminal of the Q team.
... Given your perspective and your seemingly presumed ‘flawless success’ at separating out the false Q-anon from the authentic. . . .
“Maybe connected to David Brock”? Q mocks Brock and his financial backer Soros on a regular basis.