He’s required to appear and explain the circumstances for firing a gun in a National Park? Ok, that doesn’t sound completely unreasonable. I’m assuming he explains the situation, and then that is the end of it because his actions were justified and his display use of force was totally reasonable. If, and ifffffff, he got in trouble then THAT would be a problem.
Or am I missing something here?
How in the world is it reasonable to prohibit discharging a firearm in the wilderness?