[Pearls Before Swine]

Artistry on demand is slavery, not “public accommodation.”

[so_real]

The distinction is clear and obvious to everyone with a rational mind. Regrettably that rules out the majority of liberals. And they are littered throughout the court system like trash on a highway. Time to Make a America Clean Again!

[Salman]

The issue in a nutshell:
Whether the state has the authority to compel participation in a religious ceremony.

The specific views of the objector do not enter into it. The objector only has to prove compulsion.

[DiogenesLamp]

If the bakery had refused to sell them an existing cake, then they should be shut down immediately, because this really is discrimination, but they were asking for a unique creation that was not being “offered.”

The concept of "freedom" requires us to accept that people can reject business for any reason they like. It is not the business of government to enforce morality on people.

[tbw2]

The unfair double standards.

That the Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruled in one week the homosexual baker could refuse a pro-traditional marriage message cake per their political beliefs. But the Christian baker must make the wedding cake or be sued.

That the imam can call for death of homosexuals and be patted on the head, while the Christian who says I don’t want to provide flowers for your homosexual wedding is not only sued and punished, but the state government rips away the corporate veil so that her PERSONAL property can be taken away in addition to her business. In short, extra punishment for the Christian who defies liberal orthodoxy. An unfair standard.

That Facebook can discriminate against non-PC viewpoints it doesn’t like, because it is a private business. But Christian owned businesses cannot discriminate against PC viewpoints because that’s a violation of human rights regulations liberals wrote to privilege their viewpoints and preferred so called victim groups.

[a fool in paradise]

Can a printer refuse to publish Black Panther hate tracts?