Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomNotSafety
So you live in a rural area that does not makes sense to service at $50 per month for streaming videos. I find that completely plausible.

Oh, I agree and don't blame the cable companies for not wanting to lose money running wire to the farm. My point was only that today cell and satellite aren't real competition to wired broadband.

What is your local government doing? Have they granted a monopoly franchise to Comcast?

I don't know the history but I wouldn't be surprised if Cox was given a monopoly at one time.

The issue in many places is that the first movers who installed the cable infrastructure now have a de facto monopoly on broadband since the cost for new provider to install 'last mile' coverage is prohibitive.

I think this will change as broadband wireless services become more widely deployed, but for now many consumers have only one realistic choice.

30 posted on 11/28/2017 8:49:11 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

“I wouldn’t be surprised if Cox was given a monopoly at one time.” That would explain why you are having such a hard time.

Governments create monopolies.


31 posted on 11/28/2017 9:00:20 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson