Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: socalgop

From your article:

” Much like Netflix’s ongoing standoff with Verizon FiOS, the drop in speeds wasn’t an issue of the ISP throttling or blocking service to Netflix. Rather, the ISPs were allowing for Netflix traffic to bottleneck at what’s known as “peering ports,” the connection between Netflix’s bandwidth provider and the ISPs.

“As we’ve pointed out before, the issue of peering was not covered by the recently gutted net neutrality rules. Those guidelines only dealt with whether an ISP deliberately blocked/throttled or unfairly prioritized traffic to a website. The congestion at peering ports occurs further upstream and is a matter of capacity.”

Hoisted by your own petard.


22 posted on 11/28/2017 8:09:38 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNotSafety

Sorry, I could have spilled more ink to explain - I posted that link because it demonstrates that Comcast will gouge people to an inch of the law whenever they can - i.e. even when net neutrality regulations were in place they would do everything they could within any legal loophole to hurt competition. It’s an argument for expanding net neutrality to prevent discrimination at peering ports.

Comcast previously blocked p2p apps. More recent examples from Verizon and ATT:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/fcc-fines-verizon-125m-for-blocking-tethering-apps/2012/07/31/gJQAXjRLNX_blog.html?utm_term=.5051a04a9f84

https://www.wired.com/2012/09/factime-fcc-flap/


33 posted on 11/28/2017 9:17:52 AM PST by socalgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson