Posted on 11/27/2017 1:44:30 PM PST by sparklite2
The inspiration for the research first came to Boreyko when he was sitting in traffic one day. Noticing that cars had to wait for the car in front of them to regain a safe spacing before they could start moving again, he hypothesized that, contrary to popular opinion, it might actually be better for cars to stop farther apart from each other when idling at a traffic light.
Analysis showed that the time required for all cars to pass through remained relatively fixed, give or take about one second, for spacing distances up to 25 feet.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
I don’t care if people drive 20 or 30 miles over the speed limit so long as they stay in the slow lane to the right so I can pass them;)
That’s my big complaint about this practice.
“I dont care if people drive 20 or 30 miles over the speed limit so long as they stay in the slow lane to the right so I can pass them;)”
That’s what I do to the guy after he finally moves over.
Get away, the guy is a hazard! Buzzz!
Then I see a cop with Radar pointed at me.
I actually did beat a ticket when I told the judge that I considered a driver a hazard and wanted to get away.
I think that, and the fact that the officer did not show was why it was dropped.
I was not lying, I guess the judge agreed with my reason to pass.
Contest all tickets even, if guilty show remorse.
I once got up in front of a Judge and told him I planned on changing my lead foot ways.
He gave me a years probation.
No Tickets for one year and he would drop it.
I did it.
I did not mention the one ticket that I got a few weeks before the day and was not on the record yet. (Doh!)
Every situation is different. I can see letting someone in. If they are stopped anyway. If they stop to let someone in when traffic is moving and the person is not sure whether to go or not and there are 10 cars waiting. And the light is about to change back to red....thats a recipe for road rage.
Ditto. Trust no one. Plan your escape.
Here in Albuquerque we leave enough space to jump the curb and avoid the car-jacker until we can get our own gun out.
It might have been in Memphis, I’m not sure, but the main thoroughfare downtown had 8 lanes with a traffic light over each lane so that all lanes were reversible to handle rush hour traffic going one way in the morning then the other way in the evening.
I was a dopey tourist who thought he could beat six lanes of traffic with a left turn before they entered the intersection.
This proved to be an error. LOL
Strong impact will lift foot off the brake pedal.
At a traffic stop, I ALWAYS leave enough space where I can see pavement under the rear bumper (if present) of the vehicle in front of me. Plenty of room to maneuver in an emergency, yet not enough room for a line cutter.
Crush zones designed to absorb energy say no-go to the idea a car will act as a billiard ball.
Good ideaI've done the same for many years. Two more rules I follow:
2) If someone is going to hammer my trunk, I'll creep up and touch the car ahead. (If there is a vehicle ahead). While my trunk and hood will absorb most of the crushing damage, the mass of the car ahead will reduce the impact experienced at my neck level (and at the neck of the driver ahead). The inattentive driver behind us deserves the full impact of two cars' mass.
3) I encourage ALL fuel-trucks to pass meeven pulling into the breakdown lane as incentive to passing. Wide-Load marked trucks also get the same break from me.
Better Call Saul...
“I also practice keeping my wheels aligned straight ahead when waiting to execute a left turn across oncoming traffic. If someone slams into my rear, I wont go sailing into the path of the oncoming vehicles.”
Very good practice. I remember reading about an 18-year-old girl being killed by being rear-ended and pushed into oncoming traffic. That happened in Tucson quite a few years ago.
I hate when two or three cars are pulling this crap and keeping cars from getting to the left turn lane
I drive into a blighted urban area every day. I always leave a couple of car lengths so I can move up to avoid panhandlers or get the Hell out of Dodge if things go sideways.
I made the mistake of leaving no room once in East New York. A man chased his wife out the front door of a house immediately to my right and was waving a nickel plated .45 around. I was completely hemmed in. All I could do was wait for the light to turn.
Ive never done that again.
“If someone is going to hammer my trunk, I’ll creep up and touch the car ahead. (If there is a vehicle ahead). While my trunk and hood will absorb most of the crushing damage, the mass of the car ahead will reduce the impact experienced at my neck level (and at the neck of the driver ahead). The inattentive driver behind us deserves the full impact of two cars’ mass.”
makes a lot of sense, but what will your auto insurance company say about you not leaving enough space between you and the car in front to prevent rear-ending the car in front when you yourself are rear-ended?
“- - - - three cars from lanes beside you will pull into the space you created.”
Same scenario on ice. On icy roads, you gotta keep a greater distance between vehicles. Whenever I pull back 50 or so feet, other cars will skid, slide and do a few loop-de-loops just to fill in that space. It’s safer to drive in the ditch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.