Ummmm, No. Not even a little bit.
I do, however, plan on enjoying watching a good segment of our social potential crash and burn over the next few years.
Just watching one superior intellect deteriorate before our eyes , once, puts things into sharp focus.
I always told my sons and daughter that the self destruction of delusional druggies is a self-correcting problem. No point arguing the benefits of a drug-free existence.
If the basic foundation of liberty is freedom of choice, then why is one person's opinion/standard more valid than another's? If there isn't any one 'true' path, then who is to judge whether a life is wasted or not, worthy or not, productive or not?
If one tries to apply objective measures respecting 'success' - hard because standards by definition are artificial and hence, subjective - there are literally countless ways to get off-track.
In this context, cannabis is a small time player. Alcohol has always been, and will always be, the champ in terms of destroying lives. With the advent of genetic research and designer drugs, cannabis cannot hold a candle next to opiates and artificial derivatives with respect to destructive power.
I suspect a large part of the relaxation of cannabis enforcement is the recognition of what's coming down the line. Even in that arena, is it possible to maintain a free society if there are constant demands to control each successive generational threat? Or, do you just live and let live, and let the chips fall where they may?