1 posted on
11/08/2017 5:21:48 PM PST by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; White Bear; Salvation; ...
2 posted on
11/08/2017 5:22:28 PM PST by
bitt
(press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally)
To: bitt
I wonder if/when we will ever know who is being indicted?
3 posted on
11/08/2017 5:23:00 PM PST by
hsmomx3
To: bitt
What do the high-lighted lines mean?
4 posted on
11/08/2017 5:26:25 PM PST by
kitchen
(If you are a violin bow maker or restorer please ping me.)
To: bitt
What are the odds this is Fake?
9 posted on
11/08/2017 5:33:01 PM PST by
DrDude
To: bitt
Question is who is being indicted?
14 posted on
11/08/2017 5:41:17 PM PST by
rodguy911
(Home of the free because of the brave!MAGA!)
To: bitt
Thanks for your work on this, Liz. I was reading your analysis from Twitter earlier today and you and others are way out in front. To have this many sealed indictments in such a short time is unprecedented, at most there might be 3-4 a month. Something’s brewing...
15 posted on
11/08/2017 5:42:42 PM PST by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: bitt
Sorry I thought Liz was posting these here herself.
16 posted on
11/08/2017 5:44:20 PM PST by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: bitt
JEB said Trump would be gone by December
Wonder if he had leaked info
17 posted on
11/08/2017 5:45:11 PM PST by
uncbob
To: bitt
President Trump wasn't kidding when he said today would be a big!
When did he say that and how would he know?
18 posted on
11/08/2017 5:46:22 PM PST by
uncbob
To: bitt
It is a rather strange looking list. Never saw anything like this before. Looks like a third grader made it on word proscessor. I find the skipping of numbers interesting. There is a gap of 583 Indictments in the beginning. I doubt over 500 cases were indicted in one day when the entire year consisted of 200 for the first 10 Plus months. There have been lists of Indictments for several purposes. I seriously doubt they keep a special list for Sealed Indictments. It would be a column on the entire list with some type of marking to denote the Sealed status. Does anyone think this is real?
19 posted on
11/08/2017 5:46:36 PM PST by
DrDude
To: bitt
Is Liz Crokin our Freeper LIZ. Haven’t seen Liz in about a week?
21 posted on
11/08/2017 5:49:22 PM PST by
DrDude
To: bitt
Is there any ham left in Washington?
24 posted on
11/08/2017 5:50:19 PM PST by
P-Marlowe
(Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
To: bitt
Are there enough Clinton/Obama Judges left to handle the cases ?
To: bitt
7 new indictments filed in DC Pathetic, that this "reporter" doesn't realize these would be for the entire COURT, not just Mueller's grand jury. Potentially worse, are those that breathlessly insist it's all true, without a single care for whether it's accurate or not, because it's so "fun" to rile everyone up.
28 posted on
11/08/2017 5:55:31 PM PST by
Golden Eagle
("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
To: bitt
If we can believe it. They are sitting on them.
30 posted on
11/08/2017 5:58:28 PM PST by
Lopeover
(The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: bitt
This is from the same source that reported a Hillary/Huma/14 year old girl sex tape.
Not exactly Edward R. Murrow.
32 posted on
11/08/2017 6:04:46 PM PST by
Vermont Lt
(Burn. It. Down.)
To: bitt
The real question are any of these related to Russia election collusion?
34 posted on
11/08/2017 6:07:45 PM PST by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: bitt
Total sealed indictments in Mueller's Grand Jury: 31! So after following the actual link, it appears that you are the one that created this title, claiming there are 31 indictments DIRECTLY related to the GRAND JURY. Not the attention hog reporter, who at least only claimed they were for DC, somewhat admitting that is for the overall DC court, even though her post was still extremely misleading in order to gin up the most interest.
So did you insert the words "Grand Jury" into the title here on FR? And why?
35 posted on
11/08/2017 6:10:02 PM PST by
Golden Eagle
("A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me" - Trump on Nov 3, 2017)
To: bitt
Tick tock, tick tock, tick tock.
To: bitt
Could be US v Ivan Doe 1 through 30
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
