Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Signalman

Interesting take on this subject. I am of one opinion but am trying to understand why many chose the other side.
Why did Sessions wait 8 months for a Chief of Staff? Isn’t a COS involved in decision making procedures? In your narrative, I think a COS would be an absolute necessity as there would be no other control.
Question is why does Sessions feel the need to go rogue?


25 posted on 09/23/2017 8:14:59 AM PDT by DrDude (Hillary Clinton waddles into the swamp on a daily basis for bathing purposes only!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: DrDude
The article says 100 days of Session in office. Remember how long they took to get him confirmed? Maybe it has only been 3 months.

Ask McConnell why confirmations are taking so long in the Senate. Mueller, up and running with 17 D lawyer helpers,in 30 days, no confirmations needed. Obama, when confirmations got tough, even in a D congress, he appointed Czars accountable to no one.

Sessions is law and order, no matter how much the D's break or skirt laws, we can be assured Sessions will not.

46 posted on 09/23/2017 10:23:58 AM PDT by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson