Either you believe that Trump is a fool who, despite being surrounded by a very diverse group of very intelligent people, is backing the wrong candidate instead of an obviously a better choice in the opinion of an internet forum - or that he is aware of something or pursuing a strategy that you’re not aware of.
Occam’s principle is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is. I don’t assume that internet posters have better insight than the President of the United States does.
Strange is in McConnell’s pocket. Can you name a worse swamp creature than McConnell?
Incidentally, I have believed in and supported Trump through thick and thin. My posting history bears this out. I’ve been one of his staunchest defenders. But Luther Strange is a bridge too far. He is the swamp personified.
Btw, no one who says to trust Trump’s opposition to a good man like Moore even offers a theory as to what’s going on. They just say blindly trust. That is cultish. One of the 4-D chess people needs to pipe up and offer a theory. Throw us a bone. At least hint at the grand scheme that unfolds after McConnell gets his newest yes-man and a unique opportunity to put a strong anti-swamper in the Senate has been lost.
In this case, the shortest evidence chain pointing toward the assumptions under discussion seems strongest for Trump choosing a creature of The Swamp over a candidate that appeals to the base that elected Trump. You appear to favor the longer evidence chain of assumptions. It is certainly possible you are correct and only time will tell. Have a great FReepin' day/weekend - looking forward to Tuesday!