” the world is a better place without him.”
No question.
“Smith drove at speeds of up to 87 miles per hour on wet roads, endangering other drivers and pedestrians.”
Not enough to declare him guilty of the alleged crime he was accused of. Irrelevant to the changes.
“About 45 seconds before the chase ended, police dashcam video captured Stockley saying, “going to kill this (expletive), don’t you know it.”
The video commentary and in Court, it was alleged he MAY have said that. According to the Court the alleged commentary was hard to hear and might not be what was said. I heard something different. I heard the officer say something along the line of “he” (slime) was going to kill someone.
“On this video I could not see the street because of the weather conditions so how could they???”
Not unusual and quite often, cameras are unable to record because of light conditions, inclement weather, other environmental factors. What the cameras “see” versus what the driver sees are quite different.
“The cops even wrecked their SUV once in this pursuit.”
Deliberately ran their patrol car into the worthless slime to stop him. Done all the time during chases. Not a loss of control but deliberate act.
Irrelevant to the charge.
Look we all know this man was an ED-209 I never denied that.
They could have caught up with him later.
They could have put him down like the ED-209 he is... later.
In a more discrete way without potential injury to innocent citizens.