Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Did Egg McMuffin run his own digital operation?
1 posted on 09/08/2017 10:58:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

OH goody wisdom from Johnny Kaisich’s digital weenie

About as useful as a turd in a punch bowl


2 posted on 09/09/2017 1:12:15 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The author of this article tries to make it about Kasich, but it is not about Kasich. It is about the vast anti-American internet presence that got turned into pro-Trump.

Even FreeRepublic was full of popular posts from communist The Nation and Red Morning Star trashing America, but these were interpreted as anti-Establishment and thus pro-Trump.

I must disclose that I found Kasich the best of the bunch.


4 posted on 09/09/2017 5:15:02 AM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In short, Russia did not “hack” our election. Russians may have attempted to influence our election, some of them opposed to Hillary even though it was her turn.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/07/12/ngo-connected-to-obamas-2008-campaign-used-u-s-tax-dollars-trying-to-oust-netanyahu/?utm_term=.f30ed0984817
This is the Washington Post, the official propaganda outlet for the Democrat Party, admitting that the leader of their party used our tax dollars to manipulate elections in Israel, one of our strongest allies.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/22/barack-obama-brexit-uk-back-of-queue-for-trade-talks
This is the ultra-liberal Guardian reporting that Obama was threatening the UK, trying to influence an election in another country that is a strong ally.

I could go on, but clearly influencing foreign elections is standard operating procedure for the government of the United States. It’s hypocritical (a leftist specialty) to clutch their pearls over the possibility that instead of influencing exclusively in favor of Democrat/socialists, as Russia and the USSR have done for generations, some Russians in 2016 may have attempted to block a far left tyrant who would have destroyed western civilization.


5 posted on 09/09/2017 5:36:50 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Has anyone seen specific citations of this supposedly “Russian fake news”? In all of the articles I have seen, nobody cites specific examples.


6 posted on 09/09/2017 6:13:54 AM PDT by axxmann (If McCain is conservative then I'm a freakin' anarchist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So the whole Russian influence thing boils down to $100,000 in FaceBook ads? $1.98 is a lot by Kasich standard, but Hillary spent a billion dollars directly, and who knows how much through surrogates.

I am fed up with this hypocrisy of looking at only ostensibly pro-Trump election interference. What about foreign governments and pacs playing the same game for Hillary? Anyone think Soros directly or indirectly bought anti-Trump ads?


9 posted on 09/09/2017 6:52:26 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just guessing here.
Kaisch spiked the $100,000 for Facebook ads in favor of $100,000 direct mail cards delivered by postmen


10 posted on 09/09/2017 7:06:57 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson