[Nextrush]

It looks like things may be unraveling after the prosecutor and judge in the second Bunkerville Standoff trial bent the case in such a biased direction denying defense witnesses, removing a defendant testifying in his own defense etc. etc.

A hung jury maybe 10-2 in favor of a not guilty verdict?

Related videos on the "JGrady" account on You Tube.

[AndyJackson]

10-2 in favor of a not guilty verdict

Whoopiee. Re-Retrial. Third time's a charge.

[JayGalt]

This whole thing is a travesty when the Gv’t acts like thugs.

[Karl Spooner]

Related:

https://www.oathkeepers.org/bunkerville-retrial-innocence-irrelevant/

[WildHighlander57]

Thanks for the update; we need a new judge and two jurors...

“...The defense asked for a mistrial, but Judge Navarro declined.

Observers of the trial sympathetic to the defendants see something happening here which may be positive, resembling what happened in Portland during the first Oregon Standoff trial last year.

That was when the bias of a juror was questioned leading to the jurors removal and eventually a not guilty verdict for all seven defendants.

But Judge Navarro seems stubbornly determined to see no bias in the jurors or the need to replace them perhaps fearing the possibility of a “not guilty” verdict.

One other point made in videos from John Lamb, Maureen Peltier and Andrea Parker today was that jurors did not tell the truth about themselves on questionnaires which is grounds for a mistrial.

Andrea Parker expressed her view in video posted on the “JGrady” account on You Tube minutes ago that there is a hung jury in the case with two jurors stubbornly biased against the defendants.

The jury left for the day at 5pm.

Back to continue deliberations tomorrow.