Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated; LS

Is LS saying that the MSM are not dependent on viewers/readers/advertisers to stay in business? That they receive donations FRom the Swamp Critters to stay in business?

Perhaps President Trump has a solution for this problem as well - in addition to the psych “head game” you point out.

I don’t know what it is our could be, but methinks President Trump has a HUGE ACE up his sleeve! The “head game” is probably part of it, now that you raise the issue.

Consider: President Trump did not survive the rough and tumble environment of multiple successful NYC construction projects and build a world-wide five star hotel chain or initiate any of his other successful ventures and thereby become a billionaire by being naïve or a pushover or a wuss!

IMHO, he’s got this whole thing figured out, and is just waiting to play his Ace and lower the boom on the Soros/Ophonybama/Clinton bought & paid for LIEberal/Socialist/Marxist/Fascist/Communist “Rent-A-Thug” bastards behind these insane, violent and now, deadly “demonstrations!”

“Street theater” is one thing; violent street theater is something else entirely!

And, when he does play his Ace and lower his BOOM on these LIEberal America hating thugs, it will be a big one!


55 posted on 08/19/2017 4:26:49 PM PDT by Taxman (Replace the income tax with the FAIRtax and abolish the IRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Taxman

I am saying exactly that. If you could get inside the books of the major “news” companies, they would barely make money, if at all. They are hobby horses for the larger corporations and CEOs to wave their SJW creds around.

In the 1830s, Martin Van Buren, founder of the Democratic Party, created the first true “news” papers. But they didn’t print “news” at all. They were 100% propaganda organs for Andrew Jackson and the DemoKKKrat Party. One academic study concluded that 80% of ALL papers in America were fully owned by one of the parties and made NO money at all on subscriptions.

That’s again where we are. How else do you explain that Fox, which in theory can command HALF the political viewing audience, is moving to the LEFT???? It has nothing to do with revenues, and everything to do with the Murdoch boys’ leftward SJW leanings. See some of the data here:

http://bigleaguepolitics.com/impending-entertainment-news-realignment/

How would you explain CNN, with 100,000 viewers (!!) stays in business? Glenn Beck at his peak had 3.5 MILLION.

So reconsider all (including Fox) of the “news” organizations as propaganda fronts for the DNC ultimately back-channel funded to keep them alive.


56 posted on 08/19/2017 5:14:00 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson