Posted on 08/12/2017 3:39:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
One year ago, the news broke that the Democratic National Committee had been hacked. Tongues began wagging and fingers began pointing that Russia was behind it. However, Democrats might want to get the Kremlin on the phone and offer an apology because a new report suggests the DNC hack may not have been a "hack" at all.
It could have been an inside job.
According to a new report at The Nation, forensic experts and former national security advisers have quietly gathered over the last several months to examine the breach and they have determined the DNC email hack heard ‘round the world was conducted from within the DNC....
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
This useless witch hunt will devolve into a trick-bag process crime like Scooter suffered. This needs to stop - based on the FACTS and EVIDENCE, or lack thereof.
I’ve never been convinced it was the Russians - I’m not saying it wasn’t but the rationale for Russia to take out Hillary doesn’t make sense - she is bribeable and pliable - they already knew that. Why would they want someone they can’t control at the helm of the most powerful country?
Besides, all the people who started saying Russia Russia Russia are known liars.
I accept now that it was Seth Rich ( later assassinated) who used Kim dot Com to high speed data dump to the Wiki agent in New York. That is why Kim admitted it and Julianne Assange posted a 50,000 reward for the conviction of the assassin. It is now impossible at the speed tracked of 22 GBS sec to get anything to Russia. We all knew that was fabricated as an excuse for the left wing ideology being so thunderously defeated by our great President. May God continue to bless and keep Donald J Trump. Now we rub it in hard.
S...e...t...h....
No one is mentioning Wasserman’s Muslim IT boy toy (or Seth Rich).
Shouldn’t Mueller’s focus be on the DNC server, if that is where the hack allegedly happened?
Investigating Russian interference is a cover story. The true agenda is to get Trump for “obstruction”. The investigation has no legal grounding, it is political operation.
There’s not doubt Seth Rich downloaded the emails and got them to Wikileaks.
I’m of the opinion John “Molesta” Podesta knew Seth was the leaker and sanctioned the hit - perhaps by Awan.
As an aside, Podesta also mentioned “wetworks” a few days before SCOTUS Scalia was found dead with a pillow over his face.
Hard to argue with you. More evidence points to this than any Russian narrative. As an aside, I prefer “Pedosta”.
same facts, different day... but there are more stories about this every day...
I’m waiting for some justice, here...
Where did Podesta mention wetworks?
Podesta mentioned “wetworks” in one of his emails published by wikileaks.
He discovered what happened to Bernie Sanders in the election. Bernie had his donors stolen,some of their money went to hillary and there was a concerted effort to divert votes from ol' Berny to the hildabeast.All orchestrated by the DNC.,p> Rich discovered it all and it made him crazy since he was a closet Bernie supporter. He planned his revenge.He hacked the DNC computers put the info on three thumb drives and made sure the info would reach wiki even after he was dead.He realized what he had done would probably get him killed.
It did.
He was shot twice walking home from an eventful evening at a party full of suspects.He closed his regular bar and then had two unaccounted hours before he was shot twice at 4:40 a.m. He was stabilized at Medstar dc by a fourth year resident who claimed he was stable and the rest of his wounds could be fixed in the morning. Later that evening many thought he was killed by dr. Sava head of surgery also at Medstar.
Jury is still out. At this time some think he is still alive.
Seems the disinformation genius' are hard at work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.