Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Controversial Florida Judge Claims Legislature does not Have Power to Make "Stand Your Ground" Law
Gun Watch ^ | 5 July, 2017 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 07/12/2017 2:24:01 PM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: marktwain

Dear Judgie:

They do, and they already did, and you can try to enforce YOUR viewpoint all by your little pinhead self.


21 posted on 07/12/2017 5:39:26 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

He needs to be removed from any position of authority. Failing that, utterly and completely IGNORE and ridicule him.

At the moment he uttered this assholishness, the Florida GOP Legislatures should have been introducing and ramming through even STRONGER “Stand Your Ground” protection.


22 posted on 07/12/2017 5:42:19 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Circuit Judge Milton Hirsch intensely dislikes the "Stand Your Ground" concept.

"Why should you get to "Stand Your Ground" when I have to keep moving my desk and changing my stapler?"

23 posted on 07/12/2017 6:22:42 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Except that they changed the law!


24 posted on 07/12/2017 7:32:24 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Start using cash and checks or the elite class and bankers will make "cashless" the norm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
If the legislature does not have the power to shift the burden of proof, they have the power to require reimbursement for lawyers fees and court costs if a self defense claim prevails in court.

Some Florida legislator should bring up exactly that bill. Then we would have BOTH: prosecutor has burden of proof, AND payment to defense lawyer comes out of prosecutor's budget if jury decides it was self-defense.

25 posted on 07/13/2017 3:59:58 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

I live in Florida.
I have a CCW.
I carry a very fine Kimber .45 with a nice lazer built in.
I refuse to become a victim.
No threat, just fact.
And all over this country there are millions like me.


26 posted on 07/13/2017 4:48:48 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (President Trump makes obammy look like the punk he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RetiredTexasVet

My knowledge is third-hand. A legal-beagle FReeper read the ruling and pointed out that the administrative changes made under the new law do actually fall within the areas vested in the judiciary under the existing law, without changing the vesting. I cannot remember who the other FReeper was.

Basically, the revision to the law has to take the vested authority away from the judges in order to make administrative changes to the existing law, to my understanding.

None of this, of course, modifies the fact that a judge who is anti-second amendment is not fit to be a judge.


27 posted on 07/13/2017 6:41:01 AM PDT by MortMan (Adoption is God's grace in human action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson