Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: oh8eleven

Did posts 11 and 18 clear it up for you, or do I need to use smaller words?

Basically this piece of crap article insists that it is still okay for women to be i an MOS if part of that MOS never deploys. But that utter bullshit means that there are fewer (sometimes zero) noncombat postings available to give combat troops downtime between tours in the shit.

I am not okay with that. Women don’t need to be in any MOS that deploys ever. It is damaging to the troops who have to pull their weight in wartime whether declared or undeclared.

Is third time the charm? Can you grasp my point now? I oppose this half assed measure which is not enough to fully correct the problem.


25 posted on 07/12/2017 7:01:16 AM PDT by MrEdd (long hours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: MrEdd
Did posts 11 and 18 clear it up for you ...
I read your posts and I'll just repeat what another FReeper said to you - "You’re not even making any sense and you’re wasting everyone’s time on here."
Your totally uncalled rudeness didn't help either.
26 posted on 07/12/2017 7:55:58 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson