Does he have an obligation to take the word of all 17 intelligence agencies or just the three that assert the Russians hacked the DNC without evidence?
Of course, the fact that Russia (and China, North Korea, and who knows how many others) routinely attempt to hack into US computers is not evidence that Trump and Russia colluded. And at this point, the fact that hacking exists is being paraded around as proof positive that Trump and Russia colluded.
The collusion story has been extremely muddy from the get-go—because it has no substance, and the far-left media keeps inventing new spins on the story. Hillary initially claimed collusion between Russia and Trump during her campaign as a means to deflect attention away from her incompetencies and her illegal acceptance of millions of dollars from Russia in return for access to our uranium supply. In other words, she did collude with Russia—and still lost the election (thank God).
I lost all faith in the hacking report when I learned that Coast Guard Intelligence did not sign off on it.
It wasn’t even three agencies. It was a hand picked committee of 12 from three agencies.
PDJT has an obligation to take the word of all 57 LSM organizations.
Right - the DNC.
So why are they blaming Trump for the Democratic Party’s lack of cybersecurity measures. Which they didn’t put in place.
This is a partisan issue that has absolutely nothing to do with the election outcome last November.
Maybe Russia did do it but if they did, they helped Americans see Hillary Clinton for who she really was. We should be owing them thanks rather than blame them for hurting her.
That’s what its really all about.