[Sean_Anthony]

Nice summation

[cincinnati65]

I've already that snopes.com's "False" rating on certain negative liberal rumors almost always comes down to their inserting a word or circumstance in the rumor that wasn't originally there.

For example: Rumor: Bill Clinton admitted to engaging in oral sex with an intern in the Oval Office while president.

Snopes determination: FALSE

Explanation: While there have been numerous allegations and substantial evidence to support that Bill Clinton engaged in oral sex with Monica Lewinsky, the story is false in two areas: 1) Bill Clinton repeatedly denied the allegation, and never admitted he did anything. 2) All evidence indicates that the alleged activity took place in a bathroom off the Oval Office and not in the Oval Office itself.

[Sergio]

bkmk

[Boomer]

I’ve learned to not use Snopes as a reference unless I want to prove my point to a leftist since it is a leftist, um, something, not a fact checking organization because it doesn’t do that, but it is funded partially by G. Soros so we know right off the bat it’s hinkey.

In reference to doublethink, doublespeak, and newspeak; I like to use a phrase I heard long ago.

“You can lead a leftist to water but you can’t make him ‘think’”

[ek_hornbeck]

The best example of Leftist doublethink is the fact that they champion feminists and homosexuals as (alleged and imagined) victims of conservative Christians while simultaneously championing Muslims who routinely treat women like cattle and who torture and brutally murder homosexuals.

[SaraJohnson]

Leftists tolerate differences in race, gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic status but are extremely intolerant of differences of opinion

---

Not true. They are extremely intolerant of whites, especially white men.

[jmacusa]

Yes. Double plus good!

[sauropod]

Bkmk