[2ndDivisionVet]

Three page article.

[Timpanagos1]

Nashville
Kansas City
Austin
San Antonio
Houston
Dallas
San Jose
San Francisco
Boston

Lots of jobs, high wages and good standards of living.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

The real metric should be the ratio of wages to housing costs. People making $100K in Silicon Valley are living in 300 square feet "housing units".

Most cities with very high wages have commensurate housing costs.

[Mr. Jeeves]

How come we never hear much about which cities are enabling small business entrepreneurs to create the most jobs? Because it might make Democrat politicians look bad? :)

[Macoozie]

“business and professional services” ?
Sorry folks, have to disagree.

Talk about OUTSOURCING, or H-1B inside-out-sourcing potential, or simple hiring proclivities of major IT and engineering companies . . .

Great for hi-tech folks. For skilled tradesmen, not so much.

Make it here, or tax it.
America needs to build stuff again.

[smokingfrog]

I think the manufacturing sector is still sagging a bit.

[sergeantdave]

The majority of the jobs are created in exurbia.

No company in its right mind will go to a city populated by head-bangers, gangs, liberal dope smokers and welfare bums and expect to find a stable workforce and work environment.

Companies locate to areas where families live because companies can expect to find hard-working individuals who show up to work everyday and are committed to the work ethic and culture.

Families with children have been fleeing big, leftist cities by the tens of millions for decades because they found that leftist cities are not conducive to raising families or making money to raise those families.

These articles written by leftist city planners are Marxist slop to brush over the continued degeneracy and the failing of big cities across America.