Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92

Remember, as a con artist Alinsky is not just a liar, he’s also a thief. Meaning he would steal credit for ideas that have existed since the beginning of history.

None of the “rules” you listed are novel ideas. Their only distinction is that Alinsky worded them in a particular way in his book.

In other words, Alinsky’s “rules” are like the message in a fortune cookie. Generic and applicable even when there’s no real connection. Loomer and Posobiec could have had Alinksy’s tactics in their back pocket as they did this at the theater, or they could have done exactly the same thing without ever having heard of Alinsky.


99 posted on 06/20/2017 8:33:42 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

>>None of the “rules” you listed are novel ideas.

With the exception of scientific and technological breakthroughs, nothing is a novel idea. In most cases, the only thing new is bringing old ideas together in a synthesis to create something never created in that form before.

we often give credit to people who assemble old things into a new form. Your hatred of Alinsky doesn’t change anything, except in your own head.


100 posted on 06/20/2017 9:39:37 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson