Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92

Well then, now this sounds very different. Maybe you’re talking about some strategy that didn’t really originate from Alinsky. Seems to me he used old ideas and mixed them with a anti-morals philosophy.

As for the rest—here are two basic and extremely different reasons to speak of morals. One, morals for the sake of appearance. Two, for the sake of the morals themselves. My usual assumption is that everyone knows the second is the only consideration.


92 posted on 06/19/2017 9:09:12 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

>>Maybe you’re talking about some strategy that didn’t really originate from Alinsky.

TACTICS. I’m talking tactics. Tactics are part of a strategy. They are tools to achieve an end. The end varies according to your needs. Just as I can use a submarine in WW2 to sink American troop ships and I am a villain, but I can use it to sink Japanese troop ships and I get a Medal of Honor. Don’t confuse tactics with strategy, or goals.

Alinsky TACTICS are just that: tactics.


93 posted on 06/19/2017 10:45:01 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson