Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now California plans to stop Trump from shrinking any national “monuments”
Hot Air ^ | June 10, 2017 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 06/10/2017 12:58:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

It seems you can’t get anything done in California these days unless you can portray it as some element of the movement to RESIST Trump. (Well, you can try to put everyone on a single payer health plan which cost more than twice the value of the entire state’s economy, but that’s an exception.) The latest brainstorm comes to us from the state’s attorney general, who for some reason believes that the President of the United States doesn’t have any authority to modify national parks or monuments, though where he cooked up this idea remains unclear. (LA Times)

California’s attorney general argued Thursday that President Trump has no legal authority to revoke or modify national monuments created by previous administrations.

In an 11-page letter to the Interior Department, state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra vowed “to take any and all legal action necessary” to preserve six California monuments, including one in Los Angeles’ backyard, that the Trump Administration may attempt to revoke or shrink.

In April, Trump signed an executive order directing Interior Sec. Ryan Zinke to review all national monuments that were created since 1996 and are larger than 100,000 acres, or were expanded “without adequate public outreach.”

California has good reason to worry about Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke turning their gaze on the Golden State when they’re finished with Bear Ears. There are several more of these “national monuments” there which are nearly as bad. The San Gabriel Mountains National Monument is yet another gigantic swath of land taking up more than 345K acres which Obama designated as a “monument” rather than asking Congress to make it a national park.

The real question here is where the state attorney general is getting his information. We’ve been over this here before and the law is pretty clear. If you want to set aside vast tracts of land as a national park, Congress has to do that. The only thing the President can do is create national monuments, but the Antiquities Act of 1906 is pretty clear on what those are supposed to include. (Emphasis added)

That the President of the United States is hereby authorized, in his discretion, to declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national monuments, and may reserve as a part thereof parcels of land, the limits of which in all cases shall be confined to the smallest area compatible with the proper care and management of the objects to the protected:

As to whether or not the President can order changes in status, we have adequate precedent there as well. In 1933 there were 56 National Monuments transferred to the Park Service. The same could be done with the ones in California and then the legislative branch could decide whether to keep them the same, shrink them or do away with them entirely. That’s how the system is set up to work. The state attorney general for California should know better, but this is probably just an effort to hurt the President as opposed to any serious legal inquiry.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Outdoors; Politics
KEYWORDS: california; nationalmonuments; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

The best solution for California is to let them exit the United States with the exception of land required for military installations. When they come on bended knee and ask to be part of the United States again, say no.

We will protect them militarily as a member of NATO if they pay their fair share of defense.

California is doomed!


21 posted on 06/10/2017 2:23:28 PM PDT by cpdiii ( Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. CONSTITUTUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Forgot to add, Washington State, Oregon, and New York City. Up State New York is inhabited by good people. New York City is not.


22 posted on 06/10/2017 2:26:15 PM PDT by cpdiii ( Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. CONSTITUTUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

let them take it as a State Park and pay for it themselves.
= = =

Well, CA shuts down stuff when it ‘cannot afford’ it.

Rest stops.

Parks.

Wonderful places, blockaded off, Keep out.


23 posted on 06/10/2017 2:39:52 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Brought to you from Turtle Island, otherwise known as 'So-Called North America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh ya, the kids made me watch that movie. The people of the land of make believe are just confused, thats the plot to Despicable Me. Drugs will do that to a person.


24 posted on 06/10/2017 3:10:51 PM PDT by gnarledmaw (Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Trump should proclaim the entire coast line from Santa Monica to San Francisco a national monument.


25 posted on 06/10/2017 3:30:35 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
“Well, Trump could call their bluff by vastly increasing national monuments in California.”

Hmmmm..So we declare all of Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Las Angeles, and San Francisco National Monuments. Once done, nothing can be built in these areas. No additional population can be housed. Aren't there rules about all types of activities not allowed in National Monuments.

In fact all liberal areas of California need a National Monument designation immediately.

26 posted on 06/10/2017 4:30:02 PM PDT by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jcon40

“The liberal freaks may not want Trump to speak for them but Conservative California doesn’t want them speaking for us”

Exactly. I’m guessing that when the SHTF against California leftists, Jerry Brown and his communist crew will be facing 20 million armed and highly trained California patriots.


27 posted on 06/10/2017 5:27:54 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra vowed “

Maybe he’s having trouble reading the English the law is written in.


28 posted on 06/10/2017 5:51:47 PM PDT by nhbob1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Nice characterization.


29 posted on 06/10/2017 11:13:29 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson