In post 7, I set out a chunk of Comey testimony, an exchange with Collins. My contention in that post is that Comey was not responsive to Collin's first question.
In post 25, you disagreed. You asserted that he answered the question.
In post 26, I characterized your disagreement as one that relies on parsing Collin's lengthy query, ignoring it basically. I did insult you, saying your defense of Comey's answer was Clintonesque.
As far as I know, you still find that Comey answered Collins' first question in a responsive way. {I submit that if he had, she would not have needed to ask again, in different terms]
Based on my impression that you believe Comey was responsive to Collins' first question, I think you are a nut case. That doesn't make you evil, and I admit, calling you names does impact the reputation associated with my FR persona. I'll live with that. If you think my demeanor is unacceptable, turn me in to the mods - see the "Report Abuse" button? It's there for a purpose.
“”My contention in that post is that Comey was not responsive to Collin’s first question.
In post 25, you disagreed. You asserted that he answered the question.”
Are you serious? If you’re going to copy and paste at least understand what you’re looking at before going to the trouble.
Below is my post #25 - I said he wasn’t asked a question about Flynn. He answered her last question which was about AG Sessions...Why on earth is that so difficult to get understand?
“”Collins didn’t ask him a question about Flynn - he answered the question she asked him about telling AG Sessions about the president’s statement(s)...””
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“”calling you names does impact the reputation associated with my FR persona””
HA!