Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/07/2017 8:45:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Number one takeaway. Someone with all of that America and Trump hating crap in her social media was given a clearance. It was all there BEFORE she was hired.


2 posted on 06/07/2017 8:58:07 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If anyone should be shot for treason in our time, it is this b!tch.


3 posted on 06/07/2017 9:07:29 PM PDT by Bon mots (Laughing at liberal tears!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Despite it’s length, The Intercept’s story conveys essentially no new substantive knowledge.

Really, Lawfare?!

Regards,

4 posted on 06/07/2017 9:08:02 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Comey leaked like a sive.


5 posted on 06/07/2017 9:21:42 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The article claims that The Intercept was vague in its instructions to potential sources, but the bottom line is that someone who has had security clearance for classified information, should be smart enough to know the pitfalls of sharing classified material in the way she did. The article makes it sound like it’s The Intercept’s fault she got caught, and not the traitor’s. And even though The Intercept issued a statement saying that “Winner faces allegations that have not been proven,” the fact is that she has admitted her guilt. What’s to be proven?


6 posted on 06/07/2017 9:36:06 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We already knew that the Russians were targeting voting systems in multiple states using a variety of methods. The only thing The Intercept’s reporting adds, beyond the publication finally acknowledging the severity of Russian hacking, is a somewhat more detailed analysis of a single incident, which does demonstrate that the Russians simply ignored Obama’s diplomatic missives to “cut it out.” >>> from the article this is #fakenews. we only know that phishing expeditions and various pings looked like russian pinging and phishing. we also know the CIA and probably every hacker can make their footprints look like the stupid russians did it. I think this directly points to CIA and FBI spooks setting up a way to disable Trump. and altho i’m not sure how this will eventually play out. i’m hoping that the truth will out. because the truth is still not being reported yet.


8 posted on 06/07/2017 10:30:50 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (снова сделаем Ам)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have been asking right along what kind of net catches only the small fish. Now we know the details. So what?


11 posted on 06/08/2017 1:16:59 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A just punishment would be a firing squad for her, and a life sentence for her supervisor.

Snowden and manning should also face firing squad.


13 posted on 06/08/2017 5:19:00 AM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Democrats... BETRAYING America since 1828.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson