Posted on 05/24/2017 4:54:02 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell
Chief Constable Hopkins declared that people have a right to be “safe from hatred”. After the Manchester Arena attack by a second-generation Muslim refugee, he warned, “We understand that feelings are very raw right now and people are bound to be looking for answers … it is vital that our diverse communities in Greater Manchester stand together and do not tolerate hate.”
My wife and I watched this Jihadist butt kisser make that statement.
My wife was an RN for 50+ years until she recently retired in her 70’s. She is a mother to our adult children, the grand mother to our teenage grand kids, the aunt and great aunt to over a dozen young people. She loves babies, kids, teens and young adults, related or not.
I will not post what this non violet person said, when she heard what this POS Hopkins said. I’m glad that she had taken her daily baby aspirin about an hour before Hopkins said his expected UK bs.
“If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the roar of its mighty waters.
The struggle may be a moral one or it may be a physical one, or it may both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has and it never will. Find out just what a people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” Frederick Douglass
BOTTOM LINE: EVIL, IN ALL ITS FORMS, MUST BE RESISTED BOTH IDEOLOGICALLY AND BY “AGITATION” (in the instant case, WAR)!
The alternative is submission.
The ARABIC word for submission is — ready? — ISLAM!
And to those of you who respond that Douglass was talking about SLAVERY, SO AM I!
Its name is ISLAM!!
Now I know why I like Daniel Greenfield. His writing sounds like Ann Coulter, which I appreciate.
Once again we see that when you show mercy to the cruel you become cruel to the merciful. You cannot make nice with those who want to kill you.
Nothing to add...
Excellent!
Dear FRiends, please ping, tweet, email and/or blog this article where it can do the most good. Here’s the original link, too:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266793/manchesters-islamist-appeasing-police-and-daniel-greenfield
ping to post 3
This terrorist trained in Libya:
https://www.startpage.com/do/searchhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmp3Jndj_o&spfreload=10
It is because they do not respect God the Father, the lawgiver. They do not really believe in justice, only in suckling. It is female narcissism writ large, imposed on white males by guilt and shame and utter lack of internal Christian values.
I'd find it heartening if the DM comment secton didn't also loathe Donald, Melania and Ivanka Trump, Prince William and Catherine, the royals in general ("freeloaders", "scroungers") and adore transgenders and gay marriages.
I saw that article. I think toxo’s off the hook. :-)
A great question. It reminds me of how many times we hear the left sling around the canard, "but the Crusades!" when actually the Crusades were few in number and largely failures at that; while Islamic incursions and occupations throughout southern Europe, northern Africa and the middle east were thousands in number.
Dr. Bill Warner, of Center for the Study of Political Islam, explains it so much better than I can:
My ancestors were smart enough to leave the UK before it became United.
Thanks sadly in a few days we will see pictures of a handful of muslims holding candles with others saying we are together, and how strong are we bla bla.
There are still people who are saying this is not all muslims, have a vigil etc.
These people are so stuck up where the sun does not shine.
Take Five Minutes and Watch the Spread of Islam Via Jihad before the Crusades (video)
The Real History of the Crusades by Thomas F. Madden, Crusade historian
Rapid rise of the death cult: Graphic shows the terrifying spread of ISIS across the globe in just two years as terror groups across South East Asia and Africa queue up to swear allegiance DailyMail, Dec. 2015
The Islamic Infiltration, Part 1: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets –Bill Whittle (video, 2010)
The Islamic Infiltration, Part 2: From Influence to Insurrection (video)
Indeed; that's exactly what happened after the recent Westminster bridge attack. See my above post 37 for more links. Have a blessed day, dear FRiend.
`
Keep in mind that the Islamic onslaught against Christians began in the 7th century and succeeded in conquering 2/3 of Christendom --- northern Africa, the Middle East, and SW Asia--- before the Western Christians began to fight back to regain the Holy Land (late 11th century.).
In intent, the Crusades were no more a campaign of aggression than the Allies landing at Normandy. They were trying to regain and hold what had been taken by Islamic fire and sword.
Here's a fascinating book, endorsed by anti-jihad activist Robert Spencer, about St. Francis of Assisi's attempt to convert the Sultan to Christianity during the Fourth Crusade --- The Real St. Francis, not the mythical soft-handed eco-hippie.
Aside from St. Francis of Assisi, the Crusaders didn't even try to convert the Muslims to Christianity. Maybe they should have?
None ... they don't exist. There is no such thing as islamophobia.
There are a lot of islamocontemnists, though. And they haven't committed any mass murders or massacres either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.