Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: truth_seeker

Seems you didn’t read the article. Intent is not a factor in the federal law, and is not mentioned in that law at all.


58 posted on 05/12/2017 3:31:40 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace

“Seems you didn’t read the article. Intent is not a factor in the federal law, and is not mentioned in that law at all.”

Then that is all the more reason that Comey was wrong.

I had looked for general aspect of “intent” in response to the claim on another site. I had just wanted to be certain that a lack of explicit intent, didn’t get somebody off the hook.

The two situations I considered were handling of classified documents, for which I have personal knowledge and experience, and impaired driving.

But you are apparently better versed. Comey was wrong.

It can be strongly argued that Comey made up the law and his interpretation, to suit his special treatment of his royal target.


69 posted on 05/12/2017 4:01:23 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson