‘’THEY HAVE TO FIND THERE IS A CONSPIRACY FIRST BECAUSE IF THEY FIND THERE IS NOT A CONSPIRACY, IF THEY CANNOT UNANIMOUSLY AGREE AND I BELIEVE THE FIRST COUNT OF CONSPIRACY HAS SIX DIFFERENT ELEMENTS AND THE SECOND ONLY HAS TWO AND IF THEY CANNOT FIND UNANIMOUSLY THAT THEY AGREE ON ANY OF THOSE COUNTS THEN THERE IS NO CONSPIRACY AND THEREFORE NOBODY CAN BE GUILTY OF ANYTHING”
So we will just have to try them again to see if we can make it stick this time around.
I suspect that the two defendants convicted in the first trial would win on appeal because the judge said without convictions on the first two charges, they could not be convicted on any of the rest like the jury did in the first trial.
No convictions on the first two charges for them, only convictions on other charges down the list.