“The drunk”
You are never going to redeem the idiocy you have spewed on this thread until you are mentally capable of comprehending that there never was a “the drunk”. There was a group of drunks and they were fighting
That is why the bar called the police rather than just having the bouncer take care of it.
Though the camera angle on the edited video doesn't show it, this drunken dingbat was just part of the herd.
But the camera didn't show the whole story and that is why things did not go well for her in court.
You seem to think that you are debating well and not looking foolish. For the whole not looking foolish idea to become at least a vague possibility you will have to learn to use plurals. “Drunks.” say it with me now “drunks.”
Well you are entitled to your opinion.
I used “the drunk” instead of saying “the lady” because she was not acting like a lady. So where you said “drunken dingbat” I just simplified to “the drunk”.
You seem to ignore or at least failed to address, the central point of my response. There were other security / LEO at the scene to handle the other “drunks”. This is normal LEO tactics. Use one officer to address the one being belligerent, use the additional officers for crowd control.
Basing everything you're saying on what can't be seen certainly doesn't sound foolish. LOL