Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: An.American.Expatriate

Sorry, you didn’t convince me.


30 posted on 04/07/2017 11:54:12 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: exnavy
Sorry, you didn’t convince me.

Well, if you feel that it is okay to deny me the representation that I feel is best for my interests based on some arbitrary criteria, then I doubt seriously if we can agree on anything. Term limits were, are, and always will be anathema to free choice of representation in our republic. It was wrong to allow them for the President. It is just as wrong to introduce them for the Senate / House. It denies the people / state the representation they want.

FWIW - if we limit the terms, the party will STILL reserve the right to anoint a follower so the system remains as corrupt as it is now. And, IIRC, the problem that was to be solved by the 17th was NOT that Senators were serving too long, but that states were going without representation / there was too much vote buying. Term Limits will not resolve that problem.

32 posted on 04/07/2017 12:13:01 PM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson