Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: An.American.Expatriate
If the Legislature is happy with the representation of the State's interests there should be no other limitation.

Because they (the legislature) are under no threat of removal unless they tick off enough of their constituents, they are looking out for themselves as much as the senators are. Pro politicians supporting pro politicians.

28 posted on 04/07/2017 10:21:30 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed

So, I (or a State) am (is) not entitled to the representative that I (they) feel is best qualified to represent my (their) interests?

Since, according to your position, neither the State nor the Federal Legislatures can be trusted to look out for our interests, why have them at all?


29 posted on 04/07/2017 10:45:49 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson