Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: An.American.Expatriate
If the States are to reassert their soveriegnty, why should the persons they choose to represent them be limited in the number of terms they can do so? That would force states to change their representation against their interest.

It would eliminate the class of individuals who are professional politicians. You know, the ones who put their own interests ahead of the good of the state or nation.

26 posted on 04/07/2017 9:46:42 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed
It would eliminate the class of individuals who are professional politicians. You know, the ones who put their own interests ahead of the good of the state or nation.

Shouldn't the State Legislatures be the ones that determine whether this is true? I mean, we are doing this BECAUSE the States are being denied their rights to representation (according to original intent). Why should the Federal Government then be allowed to dictate how often a specific person is allowed to represent their State? If the Legislature is happy with the representation of the State's interests there should be no other limitation.

27 posted on 04/07/2017 10:09:28 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson