Posted on 04/03/2017 5:27:53 PM PDT by davikkm
Have you noticed that Devin Nunes’ Dem opposition, Adam Schiff, has gone dark in the last couple of days? He had been more than proactive in his pursuit of Nunes and his “secret intelligence”…now that he has seen the latest, he is retreating. He knows that someone went full Watergate when they requested that “incidental” surveillance be turned into “on purpose/felony” intelligence allowing the unmasker 10 years of prison time.
We had heard that Nunes had received his chance to view the intelligence with the help of two White House Staffers. In fact, You’ve been hearing recently about various efforts to get rid of Ezra Cohen-Watnick. The question was why did the CIA, McMaster and assorted insiders want him gone so badly?
Cohen-Watnick is the National Security Council’s senior director for intelligence, and he was conducting a review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. The review consisted of the government’s policy on “unmasking” the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like “U.S. Person One.”
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
WikiLeaks, founded by Julian Assange (pictured), claims its Vault 7 files come from the CIA’s Center for Cyber Intelligence
It says: ‘This would permit a forensic attribution double game, for example by pretending that the spoken language of the malware creator was not American English, but Chinese.’
This could lead forensic investigators into wrongly concluding that CIA hacks were carried out by the Kremlin, the Chinese government, Iran, North Korea or Arabic-speaking terror groups such as ISIS.
WikiLeaks, whose founder Julian Assange remains holed up in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London, said Vault 7 was the most comprehensive release of US spying files ever made public.
Wikileaks dumps information claiming proof of CIA hacking
Loaded: 0%Progress: 0%0:00
Earlier this month WikiLeaks published thousands of documents claiming to reveal top CIA hacking secrets, including the agency’s ability to infiltrate encrypted apps like Whatsapp, break into smart TVs and phones and program self-driving cars.
It also claims the CIA can bypass the encryption of Whatsapp, Signal, Telegram, Wiebo, Confide and Cloakman by hacking the smart phones the applications run on.
The CIA was also looking at hacking the vehicle control systems used in modern cars and trucks, WikiLeaks claims.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4367746/WikiLeaks-says-CIA-disguised-hacking-Russian-activity.html#ixzz4cvOyfhnn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Correction: It's now legal for a Democrat WH to spy on political opponents.
If our side tries this (which I hope it does not) you'll see a radically different response from the MSM-Democrats.
You're forgetting the blood feud between the Clintons an Obama. He took the White House when it was her turn!
In 2016, Obama and Jarrett meant to have Hilary in the White House while reserving control and power of everything to themselves. The 'hack' of the DNC was an inside job– someone simply hooked up a hard drive and copied the whole damn server. Hillary's emails were taken easily enough– again, an 'inside' job via a friendly and talented spook. Snowden is safely stored in Russia with all of the US secrets.
They never thought Trump would win– even to the last.
Apparently Susan Rice was in charge of political surveillance– and she did a bang-up job. Until, she didn't.
Anyone but Trump, they'd have gotten away with it. They yet may, but the shadow has been cast.
This goes straight to Obama... NO DOUBT!
However, the big mystery now it’s if there Is anyone willing to roll over and say it.
I’m sure someone will take the fall for him but there’s always the chance the truth will see the light of day.
She did it because Obama wanted it done and I’m sure she’s been promised more money than she can spend. Besides that, SHE’S A CRAZY AUTHORITARIAN who worked for the WORLD BIGGEST MEGALOMANIAC and they are both DEMOCRATS. You serious or playing devil’s advocate?
Their guys put this sort of stuff on their resumes.
No, I get all that. And maybe the old adage about criminals being so stupid is right. But I’m serious - what did they really think they were going to do once Trump won the election?
They had to know they were committing felonies. They had to know they’d eventually be found out. And they had to know that, at most, they’d just be throwing sand in the gears, having only a temporary negative effect on the transition (before and after innauguration). So unless they really thought they’d find something that would prevent Trump from ever taking office? Seems a stretch.
I dunno - just spit-balling, but something doesn’t seem right. Maybe Rice is under the bus as the patsy for Val-Jar and/or Obama?
hey I guess the CIA will have to go with old tactics on my 79 chevy pickup and like cut the break lines or such?
One thing I dont understand is this, after the election or even before, why is it a problem if Trump spoke to Vlad? I’m against Bozos sanctions against Russia. I like that together we attack ISIS. I cant understand why we cant be friends with Russia and go after the same scourge.
Having said that, I can see with the Muslim invasion of Europe, It looks like in the future we and the Russians may have to save Europe yet again.
“.........I agree. It is impossible, in my opinion, to put a black female professional person in a high profile government position in prison for a non violent crime.”
When the RINOS find out (soon) that ALL of the R candidates were surveilled they will quickly grow a pair.
Hussein himself is beyond impeachment range but I suspect he can be simply arrested now.
Laugh if you will?
Laugh if you will?
You understand, of course, that you are trying to apply logic to a situation barren of logic?
>>If Susan Rice was the one behind all this, then is she responsible as to how the information was handled? After all it wound up in the press.<<
Susan Rice is married to the head of ABC..right? Ben Rhodes, the other person that looks to be involved, his brother is head of CBS news.
Collusion...conspiracy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.