Posted on 04/03/2017 10:04:40 AM PDT by Starman417
Adam Housley this morning reported that the NSA had collected the communications of Donald Trump, his family and his staff for more than a year prior to his inauguration and that it had nothing to do with national security. This was done solely for political purposes. (I don't have a link. I am watching it and reviewing it as I write)
In the absence of some national security threat the names of Americans are not to be unmasked (That this happened is perhaps not surprising coming from an administration which weaponized the IRS to suppress political opposition).
Housley: "these names of Americans who had done nothing wrong was disseminated to all of the NSC, some at DoD, Clapper, Brennan, basically the people at the top, they also say, I'm told, that Rice knew possibly about this as well..."
And "None of this had anything to do with national security."
It is unprecedented.
The NY Times wrongly identified two White House staffers as the source of Nunes' information. The two staffers only provided Nunes the access to the raw intel, which could only be seen on White House grounds or at the original agency. Viewing it at the original agency would expose the source.
Housley said that he does not know the name of the person who ordered the unmasking, but he asserted that it happened at a "high level" and that the information was spread to the very highest levels and it was routinely done for a long period of time.
Adam Schiff, who already has had an ample piece of humble pie, is in the process of swallowing the rest of the pie whole.
The House Intelligence committee's top Democrat said Sunday that it is too early to say whether there was collusion between the Trump team and Russia, in an apparent moderation of his past claims on the subject.Let me translate that for you. There is nothing there. There is nothing to the Trump-Russia connection. It was initially conceived to keep Trump from being elected. It failed, and now the truth is clawing its way out. democrats are desperately trying to distract from the huge ramifications of this monumental abuse of power by the obama administration.Schiff's remarks come as his committee probes any potential Trump team-Russia coordination as well as the leaks that precipitated the resignation of former national security adviser Mike Flynn as part of a broader investigation into Russian meddling.
"I don't think we can say anything definitively at this point," Schiff said on CNN's State of the Union when asked about potential collusion. "We are still at the very early stage of the investigation."
"The only thing I can say is that it would be irresponsible for us not to get to the bottom of this," he said.
Let's crank up the Wayback Machine again.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net ...
Finally!!! A story actually worthy of a BOOM!!
The Democrat Party is Evil! Beyond any comprehension.
Really?
The MSM is reporting on Bill O'Reilly, Gorsuch, you name it. Not a single mention of any spying on the Trump team by the Obama administration. Zip. Zero. Nada.
“The NY Times wrongly identified two White House staffers as the source of Nunes’ information. The two staffers only provided Nunes the access to the raw intel, which could only be seen on White House grounds or at the original agency. Viewing it at the original agency would expose the source.”
Article mentioned above was coauthored by MAGGIE HABERMAN.
Maggie Haberman has also been sitting on the Susan Rice story for two days (three now), according to yesterdays report from Mike Cernovich on Susan Rice doing the ILLEGAL unmasking.
Also of note is the claim that New York Times journalist Maggie Haberman has been sitting on the Susan Rice story for at least two days
She may have been sitting on the story because the person that leaked it to her got fired from Reince Priebus last week.
Maggie Haberman at the NYT is good friends with Katie Walsh. Deputy White House chief of staff Katie Walsh was recently fired by Reince Priebus for leaking information to the NYT.
The transparent sequence of events reveals that Walsh was the source of NYT reporter Maggie Habermans article; (Walsh and Haberman are friends).
(just connecting dots)
So, PORK YOU, Barack Obama, PORK YOU!!
Watch—all the Holier-than-Thou news outlets that covered Watergate like flies-on-sh!t will now do their best to bury, minimize, excuse or defend this.
Mentions Susan Rice but can't confirm that she did the unmasking. But he did confirm that she read the reports.
Adam Housely Interview: Sources: Trump, associates surveilled for up to year
Bttt.
5.56mm
Which is why nobody believes the MSM.
Which is why nobody believes the MSM.
BFL
Sounds like FBI Director Comey has some explaining to do...
The FBI doesn’t know of any stinkeen’ surveillance...
I wish that were true.
elderly still believe the legacy media. They don’t understand internet they still watch evening news. The vote the way the “guide card” they get handed tells them to vote.
When it comes to cord cutting, they ask what cord?
The idea is that if only Fox reports it, it’s like it never even happened.
the legacy media (which includes fnc) does not care. The democrat party is evil but it is evil in favor of THEM. They want a win at any Machiavellian price
What age is this "elderly" you speak of?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.