Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Too late to walk this one back, Evelyn Farkas
Canada Free Press ^ | 04/02/17 | Judi McLeod

Posted on 04/02/2017 12:33:36 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Candor7

I would love to see a RICO conviction of a bus load of Obama followers.


21 posted on 04/02/2017 1:17:45 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ ("Try is the first step to failure." Homer Simpson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Or in keeping with post-0bama jurist-prudence, a judge will declare the prosecutor has no case and no law applies. Next case.

No new innovations needed when judges make laws up or discard laws on the fly. Its the way its done ... now.


22 posted on 04/02/2017 1:19:35 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Any relation to Scut Farkas?


23 posted on 04/02/2017 1:20:15 PM PDT by beelzepug (Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

She made a “Speak-O” just like Jon Gruber.


24 posted on 04/02/2017 1:22:53 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Mmmmmmm....that’s for public consumption.

Betcha Evelyn’s being horse-whipped behind closed doors by the “people on the Hill.”

Is Hillary taking her calls (smirk)?


25 posted on 04/02/2017 1:33:14 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Some sort of "innovative new doctrine"

When the case reaches the Supreme Court, Roberts will claim it wasn't an admission, it was speculation.

26 posted on 04/02/2017 1:37:36 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies Tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony; Liz

Here’s where Farkas screwed up.

She was invited on Morning Joe because she had penned and spoken the identical theme that Mika and Joe have been pushing for weeks and weeks, and I think possibly even have started. The theme is everywhere now, but it starts and ends with, “Trump lies”...

Farkas fit that theme perfectly. She just wasn’t suppose to come on their show and admit that every word and tweet Trump had been saying and tweeting was “TRUE”.

This dunder-head gave out, chapter and verse, the entire play book and the tick tock on exactly how Trump was right and it was true. I thought Mika’s shift in her seat chair and her face was one of a priceless *What the Heck(?)* moment, and she ended the segment, forthwith.


27 posted on 04/02/2017 1:39:49 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Acad emi are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Once Trump has his 5th USSC vote I anticipate that the counter-offensive will begin. Because you know everything he does everything will be challenged end up and court & likely go to the USSC.


28 posted on 04/02/2017 1:40:23 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

I imagine that first she has to get over her disbelief that the laws apply to her. Not many during the obama years worried about that.


29 posted on 04/02/2017 1:42:53 PM PDT by kevslisababy (I am a Genuine Female: No after market parts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The MSM IS trying desperately to ignore this but all President Trump has to do is tweet “Thank you Mrs. Farkas for letting us know how down and dirty the Democrats Party is!” and it would explode across the media landscape.


30 posted on 04/02/2017 1:54:40 PM PDT by WMarshal (President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SnuffaBolshevik

Imagine a world where Mika sees the evidence and grills the interviewee like a real reporter would. Mika could have had the biggest story in modern American history . . . but instead it seems as if Mika pulled a cover-up.


31 posted on 04/02/2017 2:01:03 PM PDT by donna (God's standards, like it or not, are the basis for the laws that led to western civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Sessions gone after her yet?
How about Linette and his 35 million from a Listen she’ll company?


32 posted on 04/02/2017 2:02:49 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy

I’m still fascinated by the timeline. What was she doing discussing this stuff with “colleagues” when she had been out of government since the year before. She was a Clinton advisor in 2016, not a deputy director. Who was giving her this information, and who was she sharing it with? There was no legal reason for her to have this stuff. This is unbelievable!


33 posted on 04/02/2017 2:08:20 PM PDT by foghornleghorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Obama and shack up Val both are in low key now that is when they do their dirty work when silent.
Both have a lot to hide.


34 posted on 04/02/2017 2:09:56 PM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

35 posted on 04/02/2017 2:16:56 PM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

First of all, I don’t think she ever admitted to seeing top secret materials. Second, saying Obama “wanted” isn’t the same as saying Obama ordered it . I wouldn’t get to excited about this.


36 posted on 04/02/2017 2:58:16 PM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Any one have any idea the age of this EVELYN FARKAS?

Just wondering...


37 posted on 04/02/2017 3:04:43 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“If they knew how we knew what we knew”.

She was bragging about how clever and smart they all were.


38 posted on 04/02/2017 4:35:22 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (Proud member of Trump's army of online trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Newtoidaho

The walkback on her comments is going to require dance chops beyond those of a Nuryev (the Russian connection!)

I say again...she’s going to have to take some sort of medical leave or suffer a synthetic nervous breakdown in a major hurry, because if she’s subpenaed the dam gonna break.


39 posted on 04/02/2017 5:08:09 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony


40 posted on 04/02/2017 6:14:14 PM PDT by Chode (My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson