Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Yo-Yo

It’s not only about the rule of law. That argument cancels itself by the fact the the two judges took upon themselves powers that are not theirs to begin with. Should American federal courts rule on matters of the European Union? Of course not, because it is not something under their jurisdiction, just as immigration policy is not under their jurisdiction.

When the first judge in Washington State ordered the injunction, Trump should have immediately issued a statement explaining that it wasn’t valid because of any American court’s lack of jurisdiction in matters regarding immigration. By appearing to cave into the judicial tyranny, he appears weak and unable to fulfill his boasting of how he would turn the country around and not be bullied by judges, bureaucrats or the media. Where is that bold persona that promised all of this would be done immediately?

It appears that like every other “reformer” that goes to Washington, D.C., Trump appears to have been humbled on promises he swore no power would keep him from fulfilling “my first day in office!” For those who believe that he is setting some sort of trap and is about to spring it on his political enemies, I refer you to all the promised stories of “bombshell” exposes that would land Hillary and her cursed-crew in jail forever, resignations and trials for the worst offenders of the Obama administration, etc. But now - nothing.

I for one am bitterly disappointed by the lack of backbone and audaciousness that we were certain would be produced by voting for Donald Trump.


58 posted on 03/30/2017 2:19:12 PM PDT by clive bitterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: clive bitterman
It’s not only about the rule of law. That argument cancels itself by the fact the the two judges took upon themselves powers that are not theirs to begin with.

I'm sorry, but your argument cancels itself by the 9th Circuit upholding the first injunction.

The 9th has yet to rule on the second injunction.

The rule of law is playing itself out, and is not finished yet. For Trump to unilaterally play "One-Man SCOTUS" at this point and declare by fiat that the lower court was wrong and he will ignore their ruling is in itself not only unconstitutional, but sets the most dangerous precedent imaginable for the next Democratic President.

You must think beyond the present and take the long view.

70 posted on 03/30/2017 3:22:29 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson