Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Colo9250

Federal courts enjoined many things that Obama tried to do (including his DACA attempt to amnesty illegals by executive order). Setting a precedent for ignoring court orders is probably not a good idea.


23 posted on 03/30/2017 1:10:28 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

“Federal courts enjoined many things that Obama tried to do (including his DACA attempt to amnesty illegals by executive order). Setting a precedent for ignoring court orders is probably not a good idea.”

Yet Obama DID ignore the ruling. Do you not remember the Obama administrations “mistake” by continuing issue over 100,000 DACA permits? The Judge ruled the DOJ had been “intentionally deceptive” to the court and ordered dozens of DOJ lawyers to take ethics classes.


40 posted on 03/30/2017 1:37:38 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Setting a precedent for ignoring court orders is probably not a good idea.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
That precedent has already been set. Moreover, courts should never be acknowledged as having the final say about how the Chief Executive conducts the business of running the country. Unelected judges, including the Chief Justice, DO NOT have veto power over the decisions of the President, and Trump needs to move forward with his policy decisions and ignore these judges and their court orders.


51 posted on 03/30/2017 2:03:52 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (God, Guns, and Trump will save the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson