Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does Trump Let Judges Push Him Around?
afa.net ^ | March 30, 2017 | Bryan Fischer

Posted on 03/30/2017 12:38:47 PM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: be-baw

I thought I could stop asking this for at least the next four years, but...is it time to start shootin’ ‘em yet?


21 posted on 03/30/2017 1:09:07 PM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

He is waiting for that 5th USSC Justice!


22 posted on 03/30/2017 1:10:11 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Colo9250

Federal courts enjoined many things that Obama tried to do (including his DACA attempt to amnesty illegals by executive order). Setting a precedent for ignoring court orders is probably not a good idea.


23 posted on 03/30/2017 1:10:28 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

If the Democrats controlled the House and the Senate and also the Presidency, do you think they would have a problem with nominations? The problem is that Ryan and McConnel are really Democrats.


24 posted on 03/30/2017 1:11:10 PM PDT by Vehmgericht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I don’t think Trump has enough of the right kinds of attorneys working for him now. They have been unable to over turn most of these judicial roadblocks to improved border control.

I don’t think Mr. Sessions expected the prolonged challenges from both progressives and RINOs, challenges and invented lies coming forth, boldly, with no shame, humlity or great negative consequence. Perhaps he thought after the election were won by Trump, surely by then, all those pesky troublemakers would eventually hush up and fall in line with their president.
He’s still not making many ripples in the water.
John Bohener might say Sessions must still be ‘takin a nap!’


25 posted on 03/30/2017 1:11:33 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

This may be the key right here.
Waiting for Gorsuch.
If so, I just need to be more patient.
I just hate seeing the dems get away with so much uninterrupted, unchallenged by the GOP.


26 posted on 03/30/2017 1:14:28 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

realx

this is going to the supreme court as soon as trump gets his man in ...
result 5-4 in favor of trump...


27 posted on 03/30/2017 1:14:48 PM PDT by zzwhale (ho2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

He needs Gorsuch on SCOTUS first because he will probably need SCOTUS to reign in the Ninth Circus.


28 posted on 03/30/2017 1:15:41 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I can only conclude he is putting all the chips on the SC fixing this. In so doing he will be playing whack a mole with his entire agenda. I’d say we are days away from some judges saying no to the holding the funds to sanctuary cites then the climate EO then the wall then... he has ceded executive power to the Judiciary. And what if he loses at the SC or the Rats block Gorsuch? It really is catastrophic what is happening here. Is Trump a paper tiger?


29 posted on 03/30/2017 1:15:57 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Bump to ending the tyranny of the black robes.


30 posted on 03/30/2017 1:16:43 PM PDT by stevio (God,Guns,Guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Which means that the Judicial branch has more power than the other two branches, combined.


31 posted on 03/30/2017 1:16:56 PM PDT by 353FMG (AMERICA FIRST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Not yet.


32 posted on 03/30/2017 1:18:17 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Last I heard, Gorsuch’s confirmation is expected early next week.


33 posted on 03/30/2017 1:20:19 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Really, Trump should just ignore the order and order his executive branch officials (who answer only to him) to enforce his policy.

What is the judge going to do? Send his private army to DC to enforce his decision?


34 posted on 03/30/2017 1:21:33 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
I suspect this is a time of "making a list, checking it twice", and sooner or later "Santa Claus is coming to town".

It's a "huge mess" that needs cleaning up, and when the clean-up starts, it will become "unpleasant" for a while.

35 posted on 03/30/2017 1:24:26 PM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
Good question. I think you’re right. Some judge or six will say that the Feds can’t withhold funds from sanctuary cities.

There actually is a legitimate question about how much federal funding can be withheld from sanctuary cities. The original Obamacare statute would have withheld all Medicaid funding from states that didn't expand Medicaid in accordance with Obamacare; the Supreme Court, in the same decision that upheld the constitutionality of the individual mandate, struck down that portion of the statute on the grounds that it was too "coercive" of state governments.

36 posted on 03/30/2017 1:25:04 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
"The Constitution now says whatever the hell any five out of nine Supreme Court Jjustices judge want(s) it to say."
37 posted on 03/30/2017 1:27:51 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Lets see if he starts his counter-offensive after that!


38 posted on 03/30/2017 1:31:29 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

There has to be a stone in it though.


39 posted on 03/30/2017 1:32:31 PM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“Federal courts enjoined many things that Obama tried to do (including his DACA attempt to amnesty illegals by executive order). Setting a precedent for ignoring court orders is probably not a good idea.”

Yet Obama DID ignore the ruling. Do you not remember the Obama administrations “mistake” by continuing issue over 100,000 DACA permits? The Judge ruled the DOJ had been “intentionally deceptive” to the court and ordered dozens of DOJ lawyers to take ethics classes.


40 posted on 03/30/2017 1:37:38 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson