“Why do they do that? There are so many articles on FreeRepublic, I only have time to read some. Last thing I’d do is spend time perusing articles about something I’d already decided was worthless.”
The choices are rather limited if you eliminate any outliers that are always present when examining human behavior. It’s very strange for a person to take such a one-sided, inflexible stand when discussing pedophilia.
Most people who do weird things in the online world, assuming they’re not psychotic, at least understand how their bizarre behavior makes them appear to others. But not the pedophile apologists. They’re in a group all by themselves, and they seem to have no idea about such matters. . Possibilities include:
- they are pedos themselves and feel an inner need to justify their sickness to themselves, or
- they were abused as kids and still suffer from Stockholm syndrome or PTSD or whatever gives them a pathological need to defend their aggressors, or
- they are from a cultural background that thinks raping kids is normal, harmless behavior, or
- they are simple sociopaths and have no conscience whatsoever, or
- they live in their parents’ basement, don’t venture out much, and are completely devoid of social skills, even on the Internet, or
- they’ve been unjustly accused of child abuse in the past, probably by an ex-wife who was cray-cray, and they’re still fighting those ghosts and demons, or
- they get paid to troll.
Did I miss anything? :-)
So which one are you?
You’ve already had comments repeatedly deleted by the mods when you try to call people who don’t agree with your conspiracy theory “pedophile apologists” or suggest they are pedophiles themselves. Why do you continue to do that?
If you are free to post conspiracy theory threads on FR, other posters are free to disagree with your conspiracy theories. That doesn’t give you any cause to try and make loathsome insinuations about your fellow FReepers, with no evidence whatsoever.