Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LostPassword
The trimester construct (and the later viability construct of Casey) are, to my way of viewing things, more on the "remedy" side. It is constitutional to forbid some abortions, but not constitutional to forbid others. The constitutional basis conjured up out of thin air by the SCOTUS, finding a fundamental right to abortion, is nothing more than the 14th amendment.
Constitutional protection of the woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy derives from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. It declares that no State shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law."

12 posted on 03/22/2017 8:48:36 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

The legal approach and PR approach don’t need to be the same. When Feinstein says Roe is a super precedent, it seems like a good opportunity for Rs to point out that Roe leaves the option open that the fetus is a life that deserves protection of the state as much as the mother.


16 posted on 03/22/2017 9:13:50 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson