There is a very serious debate here on FR and Twitter about whether merely the ability to skewer lefties and to expose their hypocrisies alone is sufficient to support someone.
Many Freepers are insisting that Milo’s definition of “some” 13-year-olds as “sexually mature” doesn’t qualify as pedophilia or pedastery, and that (true) leftist whackos are out to destroy him because he presents such a specific threat.
On the other hand, IF (as it appears to me he does) Milo defends sex with “mature” 13-year-olds, then is there a cutting off point for support? ANY cutting off point? 12-year-olds? 10-year-olds? I don’t see where it stops. If he has an argument with specific age laws, that might be one thing, but to see it as ok, we’re down to the old prostitution joke where the guy asks the woman to have sex for $1m and she says yes, and he says, “what about $100?” and she says “What do you think I am?” and he says, “We already established what you are. Now we’re negotiating a price.”
Great thesis. Is it enough to wow the audience with conservative principles...
An adult having sex with a 13 year old is pedophilia. Period. I don’t care how someone tries to spin it.
>There is a very serious debate here on FR and Twitter about whether merely the ability to skewer lefties and to expose their hypocrisies alone is sufficient to support someone.
We’re at war with the left. If they win they flood us with 3ed worlders and then exterminate us. Giving up a weapon at their urging is retarded. I won’t even debate the content of the attack because of where it came from. If you want your daughters to grow up to work in whore houses for 3ed worlders and you sons to be sent off to work camps then by all means please continue to the media’s bidding.
Have you been watching the mess going on Europe? Hillary was planning the same thing but with 300 million Muslim Africans. If the left gets anywhere near to power they’ll implement that. Stop shooting your own side.