Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/04/2017 11:23:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
President Obama could have led the American Energy Revolution to revitalize American industry and went down in history as a transformational President who changed the world

Instead because of his radical agenda will go down in history as President who destroyed much in the world.

Instead, Trump is going to have this handed to him on silver platter and be the one to go down in history.

All he has to do is remove the Obama obstruction and get out of the way ti let it happen

2 posted on 01/04/2017 11:41:20 PM PST by rdcbn (.... when Poets buy guns, tourist season is over ......d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good find. Fracking is Making America Great Again.


3 posted on 01/04/2017 11:44:52 PM PST by AZLiberty (A is now A once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good find. Not only Trump and Palin and right-wing crazies like us here, but academic economists as well recognize the importance of cheap natural gas from the fracking revolution as a boost to US manufacturing — even as to exports. In other words, “drill, baby, drill” to “Make America Great Again.”


8 posted on 01/05/2017 1:58:56 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
CONCLUSIONS
. . . the recent removal of restrictions on crude oil exports from the U.S. would be more consequential than for natural gas in increasing domestic prices and in reducing international crude oil prices, considering the much higher degree of tradability of oil. Indeed, liquefaction and transportation costs would make exporting liquefied natural gas economical only at relatively high prices prevailing in other markets. The price differential between the U.S. compared to Asia and Europe is thus likely to persist in turn helping to lift U.S. manufacturing.
In a nutshell, transport of NG is expensive and therefore NG inherently will be most useful close to the wellhead. NG is very inexpensive at the wellhead in the US, and therefore plastics and any other NG intensive production will be sited near the NG wellheads of the US.

NG replaces oil and coal use near US NG wellheads, but oil - and also coal - will be shipped where NG ain't, whether in-country or (especially) overseas. But export of oil does put upward pressure on liquid-fuel prices in the US. Less so than it would without the competitive pressure of NG, but . . .

So converting a second car to CNG for short-haul-only duty might make more sense as we export more oil.


16 posted on 01/05/2017 7:09:08 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which ‘liberalism’ coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson