If You Thought 2016 Was a Big WikiLeaks Year, 2017 Will Blow You Away

ZeroHedge ^ | January 4, 2017 | Tyler Durden

[Stayfree]

Start stocking up on popcorn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[PGR88]

I’m still waiting for that wikileaks release that was supposed to put Hillary in jail.

[Jim Robinson]

Russians still hacking (cough, cough)?

[Cold War Veteran - Submarines]

I was going to say the same thing. The “bombshell” of 2016 never materialized and now wiki is promising a “bombshell” 2017. Call me skeptical

[Raycpa]

Bigger hype than last year? Impossible.

[CodeToad]

“I’m still waiting for that wikileaks release that was supposed to put Hillary in jail.”

They withheld it. I suspect as Trump was winning and Trump can use it once in office. Obama can pardon her but he cannot pardon her for crimes unknown.

[missnry]

I’m still waiting for that wikileaks release that was supposed to put Hillary in jail.

Hillary is stuck in the house with Bill does that count for jail?

[Stayfree]

I would believe WikiLeaks long before I would ever rely on anything the lame stream press publishes...Thank God that more and more of the American people are beginning to realize how much they have been lied to and propagandized by the liberal left, the MSM, the DNC, the Dems, the RINO's and damn near everybody in the federal government.

And to you Jim, an enormous amount of praise and thank you's for what you have done to try and save this wonderful country from all those bastards.

[mountn man]

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange: Will Release Enough Evidence for Hillary Clinton to Be Arrested!
October 31, 2016

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3487192/posts

[Pikachu_Dad]

I think he did release enough to arrest her... now we just need someone with the (redacted) to do it.

Is that why they are not going full press to discredit Wikileaks as being a Russian front ?

[Homer1]

There are a bunch of them out...one of them is her asking her housekeeper to print classified info

[RedWulf]

Wikileaks had pretty close to a zero effect on the election. It flipped a few Bernie supporters to Trump but for the most part the it didn’t grasp the public attention.

[Alberta's Child]

I think the revelations about Clinton's speeches to Wall Street donors were damaging because they convinced a lot of Democrats that she was no different than George W. Bush.

You raise a good point, though ... How many voters were actually informed about the information contained in those Wikileaks dumps?

[EEGator]

It’s with the Cold Case Posse’s big news.

I think Alex Jones or David Icke possess both...

[thinden]

worse than jail for bubba.

[virgil]

I think we were the only ones paying attention to WikiLeaks..and Hilary.

[hsmomx3]

Maybe we ought to market our own brand and sell it. I think all of us could do quite well!!

[cpdiii]

I was going to say the same thing. The “bombshell” of 2016 never materialized and now wiki is promising a “bombshell” 2017. Call me skeptical

Hillary lost and in all probability due to Wikileaks. Julian Assange and Wikileaks have changed the course of history and perhaps saved our great nation. That is a big enough bombshell for me.

I would suspect Wikileaks next exposures will be corruption between government, corporations, congress, NGOs, foreign governments and the Clinton Foundation which is not a swamp but a cesspool as big as the "Dismal Swamp" of the the old Pogo comic strip.

That comic strip was brilliant political satire of the highest order. The "Dismal Swamp" was an euphemism for Washington DC. The satire and humor and keen edged political insight was worth of William F Buckley Junior but he did not write it but he could have.

[jeffersondem]

“Obama can pardon her but he cannot pardon her for crimes unknown.”

Yes he can.

[FrdmLvr]

Maybe that’s the first bombshell of 2017.