There was nothing concrete or compelling on the research tgreads. [I read them all.] If there were, it could be distilled, put in its most succinct and persuasive form, and published. That is the only way this theory will DO anything, or have any impact whatsoever.
The reason Mal-Valers, including the researchers, react like scalded cats to the mere suggestion of actually DOING anything with the theory is twofold. First, they know—the smarter, more circumspect among them, anyway—that the theory couldn’t withstand five minute’s independent scrutiny. It has more holes in it than Bonnie and Clyde.
Second, actually doing/accomplishing anything with the Mal-Val theory was never the point. It was always just an obscure Internet club, and nothing more. Its purpose is to provide a never-ending supply of atta-boys to the researchers, and a venue for personal attacks on anyone who questions it. It was never more than that.
Just look at the theory’s actual history. It bears what I’ve said out to the letter. You can disagree with me, but you can’t disagree with facys. Show me one—just one—instance of the proponents doing anything more significant/game-changing with this theory than praising the researchers and bullying dissenters, and you’ll prove me wrong.
Just one.
Read this post before digging into too much research
;-)